Caught red-handed, Microsoft promises not to snoop on emails
READ MORE
Microsoft|intellectual property|Brad Smith|Alex Kibkalo
On Friday, Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith said the company has decided to change its email policies.
NEW DELHI: Several days after Microsoft acknowledged that it read the
personal emails of a French blogger in 2012 to catch an insider who had
leaked code related to Windows, the company said that it would change
email policies and would no longer read emails hosted on its servers
without a warrant.
According to a few court documents related to a case that involves former Microsoft employee Alex Kibkalo, who reportedly leaked code related to Windows, Microsoft went through the Hotmail inbox of the blogger who was in touch with Kibkalo to identify the leaker.
In the wake of uproar and privacy concerns, Microsoft said that its "terms and conditions" for Hotmail accounts allowed it to look into the content of private emails in order to protect its intellectual property.
On Friday, Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith said the company has decided to change its email policies. "Effective immediately, if we receive information indicating that someone is using our services to traffic in stolen intellectual or physical property from Microsoft, we will not inspect a customer's private content ourselves. Instead, we will refer the matter to law enforcement if further action is required," Smith wrote on the company's office blog.
"While our own search was clearly within our legal rights, it seems apparent that we should rely on formal legal processes for our own investigations involving people who we suspect are stealing from us," he added.
Incidentally, the case of snooping on the French blogger came at a time when Microsoft was running its "scroogled" campaign against Google, arguing that Google read emails of its users so that it could serve them advertisements.
After the details of the Kibkalo case came out in public, Microsoft was criticised by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a well-known non-profit organization that argues in favour strong privacy on the web. "The search in the Kibkalo case may have revealed criminal activity, but it was also conducted in Microsoft's self-interest, which is an exceedingly dangerous precedent. Combined with the kangaroo court potential of the company's new internal Warrants for Windows policy, Microsoft is playing with fire," said EFF.
On Friday, Microsoft revealed it is also starting a project that will "identify, flesh out and discuss important issues (related to privacy on the web)". The company said that for discussions on the issue of privacy, the Center for Democracy and Technology has agreed to convene stakeholders and the EFF will be a key participant.
The interesting bit here is that Google, which runs Gmail, and several other technology companies have policies similar to that of Microsoft when it comes to their own intellectual property. A few days ago Michael Arrington, founder of Techcrunch, wrote that he suspected Google snooped on his Gmail inbox to identify his sources within the company.
Though Google denied the allegations, it is yet to follow Microsoft in changing the email policies that gives it right to go through the private emails of a user if it is probing theft of its intellectual property.
According to a few court documents related to a case that involves former Microsoft employee Alex Kibkalo, who reportedly leaked code related to Windows, Microsoft went through the Hotmail inbox of the blogger who was in touch with Kibkalo to identify the leaker.
In the wake of uproar and privacy concerns, Microsoft said that its "terms and conditions" for Hotmail accounts allowed it to look into the content of private emails in order to protect its intellectual property.
On Friday, Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith said the company has decided to change its email policies. "Effective immediately, if we receive information indicating that someone is using our services to traffic in stolen intellectual or physical property from Microsoft, we will not inspect a customer's private content ourselves. Instead, we will refer the matter to law enforcement if further action is required," Smith wrote on the company's office blog.
"While our own search was clearly within our legal rights, it seems apparent that we should rely on formal legal processes for our own investigations involving people who we suspect are stealing from us," he added.
Incidentally, the case of snooping on the French blogger came at a time when Microsoft was running its "scroogled" campaign against Google, arguing that Google read emails of its users so that it could serve them advertisements.
After the details of the Kibkalo case came out in public, Microsoft was criticised by Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a well-known non-profit organization that argues in favour strong privacy on the web. "The search in the Kibkalo case may have revealed criminal activity, but it was also conducted in Microsoft's self-interest, which is an exceedingly dangerous precedent. Combined with the kangaroo court potential of the company's new internal Warrants for Windows policy, Microsoft is playing with fire," said EFF.
On Friday, Microsoft revealed it is also starting a project that will "identify, flesh out and discuss important issues (related to privacy on the web)". The company said that for discussions on the issue of privacy, the Center for Democracy and Technology has agreed to convene stakeholders and the EFF will be a key participant.
The interesting bit here is that Google, which runs Gmail, and several other technology companies have policies similar to that of Microsoft when it comes to their own intellectual property. A few days ago Michael Arrington, founder of Techcrunch, wrote that he suspected Google snooped on his Gmail inbox to identify his sources within the company.
Though Google denied the allegations, it is yet to follow Microsoft in changing the email policies that gives it right to go through the private emails of a user if it is probing theft of its intellectual property.
No comments:
Post a Comment